Legal Opinion

Berry v. Earling

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1936No. 7915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is the widow and appellee Boyd is the daughter and heir at law of Hugh Franklin Berry, deceased, of whose estate appellee Earling is administrator. The property of the estate consists of mining ground in the Fairbanks recording district of Alaska. Section 1, c. 12, Session Laws of Alaska 1919 (Comp.Laws Alaska 1933, § 4407), provides: “After filing of the inventory, should the' deceased have died leaving a widow or minor children, the commissioner 1 * * * shall award and set off to the surviving widow or minor children property of the estate not exceeding the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  2. Gripton v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Gelberg v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humphreys Gold Corp. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API