Legal Opinion

Kouff v. Bethlehem-Alameda Shipyard, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1949No. Civ. 13768PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

Appellant, a former employee of respondent Bethlehem-Alameda Shipyard, Incorporated, sued that company and respondent Shosted, its personnel manager, for wrongful discharge. A demurrer was sustained with leave to amend, and when appellant declined to do so judgment was entered for defendants for costs. This appeal followed.

Section 695 of the Elections Code reads; “Any election officer may, on the day of an election at which he is serving, absent himself from any service or employment in which he is then engaged or employed. He shall not, because of so absenting himself, be liable to any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  3. Morgan v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API