Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1921No. 3636PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Proceeding by R. J. Hancock and another, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws 1917, title 49), to obtain compensation for the death of a son. There was an award denying compensation, and the applicants bring an original proceeding to have the findings of the Industrial Commission annulled.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court. The plaintiffs seek to have the findings of, the Industrial Commission denying compensation for the death of a son annulled.

There is no dispute in the testimony. The deceased was a son of the applicants. He was a paid fireman in the employ of a municipal corporation of this state at the time of his death. The accident occurred in the course of his employment and while he was in the discharge of duty. He was of the age of 45 years, unmarried, and had boarded away from his parents’ home for approximately ten years. The applicants, parents, reside in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. Industrial Commisson of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farmers Gin Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Park Utah Consolidated Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ferriter's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Paul v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API