Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1905No. 14,366PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Johnson district court; Winfield H. Sheldon, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

JOHNSTON, C. J.:

In this action T. H. Burgess asked a recovery from the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company for personal injuries sustained by him while working in the water-service department of the company. He was employed as a day-laborer in digging a ditch, and on the second day of his employment the bank caved upon him, inflicting severe injury. The work was done under the orders and direction of a foreman and subforeman, whose duties, it is alleged, were to see that the workmen had a reasonably safe *455place to work, to keep a careful lookout…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. ThacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. SageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co. v. O'ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co. v. LoosleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Cope v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Brackville ex rel. Brackville v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Horine v. HammondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API