Legal Opinion

Cope v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 26, 1926No. 15524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This action was brought by defendants in error as plaintiffs against plaintiffs in error as defendants to enforce tbe terms of two su-persedeas bonds. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in tbe trial court.

Plaintiffs pleaded, in substance, that they were tbe owners of tbe indebtedness owed by Clifton C. Cope to tbe Bank of Commerce of Beaver county, in tbe sum of $2,233.67, evidenced by note and mortgage, by reason of having to pay into said bank as stockholders, under order of the State Bank Commissioner, this indebtedness, and a judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. American Bonding Co. v. State Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Lidderdale v. RobinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia · 1824
  5. McClintock v. ParishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. United States F. & G. Co. v. State Ex Rel. ShullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. International Chiropractic Congress v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Eldridge v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API