Legal Opinion

Rowan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 8, 1954No. 11225_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sued as beneficiary of a National Service Life Insurance Policy. In her reply she admitted that the policy had lapsed for non-payment of premium ,and that an application by the assured for its reinstatement had been rejected. ¡The district court dismissed the action if or lack of jurisdiction.

The only authority in the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940 as amended, to sue the United States is found in Section 617 thereof, 38 U.S.C.A. § 817. That section in turn expressly makes such suits subject to the provisions of Section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act, 38 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meadows v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. FitchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Taft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  5. Nelli v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles David Salyers (Ellen S. Salyers, Substituted as in the Place of Charles David Salyers, Deceased) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. McKay v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  3. Heritage Pullman Bank and Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. McKinney v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1969
  5. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API