Legal Opinion
Marriott at Wardman Park v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 6, 2014No. 12-AA-407PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Marriott at Wardman Park (“Marriott”) challenges the March 2, 2012, decision of the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) Compensation Review Board (the “Board” or the “CRB”) affirming a December 27, 2011, Compensation Order on Remand, in which a DOES Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”) concluded that claimant/intervenor Sylvia Gorham did not voluntarily limit her income and was entitled to continue receiving temporary total disability payments related to an on-the-job injury she incurred in September 2005. Because the Board’s ruling is supported by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Marriott International v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Georgetown University v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hughey Payne v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hart v. Federal Express Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Howard University Hospital v. D.C. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- J.O. v. O.E.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Wright v. Office of Wage HourDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023