Loesch v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YÁÑEZ, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of marihuana pursuant to a plea bargain between appellant and State. Loesch entered a no contest plea after the trial court denied appellant’s motion to have certain evidence suppressed. Appellant contends by three points of error that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence against him. We reverse and remand the cause to the trial court.
On the night of the appellant’s arrest, agents for the U.S. Border Patrol and officers of the South Central Narcotics Task Force parked in marked cars beside the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loesch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Loesch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Cerda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Loesch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Loesch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997