Legal Opinion

Loesch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1997No. 814-96Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

958 S.W.2d 830 (1997)

David Wayne LOESCH, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas.

No. 814-96.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

December 18, 1997.

Brian Wice, Houston, Rober Bellows, Three Rivers, for appellant.

Jeffrey L. Van Horn, Asst. State's Atty., Matthew Paul, States's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON STATE'S PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, Judge, joined by McCORMICK, Presiding Judge, and Mansfield, Price, Holland, and Womack, Judges,

Appellant entered a plea of "no contest" to possession of marijuana. He complained on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his motion to suppress. The Court of Appeals agreed and…

Also in this document: Dissent · Baird; Dissent · Meyers.

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API