Legal Opinion

Cefalu v. Barnhart

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 2005No. Civil Action 04-1718PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARDIMAN, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Peter Cefalu, Jr. (Cefalu) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3) of the Social Security Act (Act), seeking review of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure based on the record developed at the administrative proceedings.

Aft…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hansford v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Pounds v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Seney v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016
  4. Sherman v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Bentzen v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API