Legal Opinion

Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 17, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

In this workmen’s compensation case, the fact that the employe suffered injuries arising out of and in the course of the emplojonent is not challenged. It is the extent of the injuries claimed by employe and thus the percentage of the total disability allowed him that is contested.

The petitioner, fifty-nine years of age, was employed by the prosecutor as a butcher and salesman. As part of his work lie helped deliver beef sold; in so doing he was obliged to and did carry beef weighing one hundred to one hundred and thirty pounds to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Jackson v. D., L. W.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Hercules Powder Co. v. NieratkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. Furferi v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Calicchio v. Jersey City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  2. Rivers v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1946
  3. Patterson v. Rynar, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1940
  4. Schumacher v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API