Legal Opinion

Hercules Powder Co. v. Nieratko

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1935PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the conclusion reached by the Supreme Court in this case and with the judgment entered therein. We are not, however, to be considered as giving assent to the dictum in the opinion filed in that court to the effect that sections 236-16 and 236-17 of the Workmen’s Compensation act (Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat. 1911-1924, p. 3879) requiring notice that the workman has received personal injuries are directory onfy and that the notice need not be in writing. The employer in the present case had actual knowledge of an injury and acted thereon by the voluntary payment of compensation, and…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bucuk v. Edward A. Zusi Brass FoundryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Belyus v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Dalton v. GesserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  4. Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API