Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Wright Aeronautical Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 15, 1946Published

1Opinion of the Court

Delaney, C. P. J.

In this compensation ease, petitionerappellee, hereinafter called the petitioner, claims compensation for an operation which she alleges was made necessary because her work aggravated an already existing physical condition—Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co., 118 N. J. L. 89; 191 Atl. Rep. 483; Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo, 13 N. J. Mis. R. 878; 181 Atl. Rep. 901; affirmed, 117 N. J. L. 148; 187 Atl. Rep. 372; Dougherty v. Miller, 14 N. J. Mis. R. 229; 183 Atl. Rep. 904; affirmed, 117 N. J. L. 454; 189 Atl. Rep. 137; and the questions involved are, did petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunn v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  2. Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Matthews Construction Co. v. RanalloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Dougherty v. Anthony P. Miller, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Dougherty v. Anthony P. Miller, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API