Legal Opinion

Camardella v. Courtright

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 16, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appeal here is' from a final decree on the merits after testimony was taken and reported by Spefcial Master with his findings of fact.

The final decree adjudicated the approval of report of the Special Master and dismissed the bill of complaint at plaintiff’s cost.

The appellant presents in his brief one question, in the following language:

“Where the sole and only inducement for the appellant, vendee, to enter into a written contract to purchase a group of lots from the appellee, vendor, is the representation of the vendor’s duly authorized agent that a portion of said lots are in effect,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Columbus Hotel Corp. v. Hotel Management Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Willis v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Pepple v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. George E. Sebring Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robson Link & Co. v. Leedy Wheeler & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Cassara v. BowmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. Scocozzo v. General Development CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Tonkovich v. South Florida Citrus Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Turnberry Court Corp. v. BelliniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API