Georgia Continental Telephone Co. v. Georgia Public Service Commission
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Per curiam
Touching the rule to show cause against attachment for contempt of our former interlocutory order of injunction, the injunction is to be held one against enforcing the scale of rates as a whole which was prescribed.on November 17, 1933, and which as a whole appeared to be confiscatory. This injunction did not prohibit, but rather contemplated, another rate investigation and the making of another scale of rates. The commission annulled its rate order of November 17, 1933, and on May 15, 1934, began a new proceeding upon which a scale of rates issued on June 22, 1934, which is now about to be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. City of Jackson, Miss.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1935
- Montana Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1935
- Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. City of St. EdwardDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1955
- Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. City of St. EdwardDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1955
- Indianapolis Water Co. v. McCartDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1934