Legal Opinion

Douglas Fir Lumber Co. v. Star Lumber Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1921No. 2498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Union County; Leib, Judge. Action by the Douglas Fir Lumber Company against Star Lumber Company. Judgment for plain-' tiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.

RAYNOLDS, J.

On November 23, 1917, the Clayton Construction Company, a partnership doing-business at Clayton, N. M., sold to the Star Lumber Company, the appellant herein, all its merchandise and equipment used in its lumber business at Clayton, N. M. It is conceded that an attempt was made to meet the requirements of the Bulk Sales Law (Laws 1915, c. 22), but that the provisions thereof were not complied with. The purchase price was .approximately $7,000. Part of this money was used in paying some of the cerditors of the Clayton Construction Company. The appellee, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Daly v. Sumpter Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Kohn v. FishbachWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Williams v. Adler-Goldman Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. Marlow v. RingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brinson v. Monroe Automobile & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Rothchild v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wasserburg v. Coastal Aluminum Products Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Rapides Packing Co. v. Olla State BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Johnston v. Stromon Motor Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API