Legal Opinion

Rothchild v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1929No. 24,826PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Appellant was indicted and convicted in the court below of perjury. §2577 Burns 1926, Acts 1905 p. 584, §475.

• The evidence adduced at the trial is not before us. The only error assigned necessary for us to consider is the overruling of the motion to quash the indictment, which, in substance, charged that on September 25,1923, appellant willfully, corruptly, falsely, unlawfully and feloniously did make his voluntary affidavit before Ralph M. Spaan, a notary public, stating that he was the absolute owner in his own right of all the property described in a bill, of sale attached thereto, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harrison v. RiddellMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Burnett v. TrimmellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Newman v. GarfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  4. Smith v. BoyerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Peck v. HibbenIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Howard Dragstrem v. Richard E. Obermeyer, United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. Muniz Etc. v. United StatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Ralston Purina Co. v. DetwilerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Blake v. First Crown Financial Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. WhartonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API