Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

VAUGHN v. KIEL

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 2, 2022No. 3:21-cv-15194Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LAMONT VAUGHN, Civil Action No. 21-15194 (FLW) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE EDWARD KIEL, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Lamont Vaughn, who is currently confined at Essex County Correctional Facility, in Newark, New Jersey, seeks to bring this civil action in forma pauperis, without prepayment of fees or security, asserting claims pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents,

403 U.S. 388

(1971).1 The Court previously administratively terminated this case because Plaintiff did not submit an application to proceed…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API