Legal Opinion
State v. Murray
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 4, 1992No. 91-390PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Defendant appeals a trial court decision extending the terms of her deferred-sentence agreement after the period of the deferral had passed but before the five-year limit on deferred sentences contained in 13 V.S.A. § 7041(a) had expired. We reverse.
Defendant pled no contest in district court on October 15, 1987, to a charge of welfare fraud. On that same day she and the State entered into a deferred-sentence agreement, which was approved by the court. Pursuant to the agreement the court deferred imposition of sentence for three years, from “the 15th day of October, 1987, to the 15th day of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Ross Joseph StradaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- State v. BubarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Nash v. Warren Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
- Jett v. LeveretteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Trustees of Net Realty Holding Trust v. AVCO Financial Services of Barre, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. PapazoniSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- State v. BlaiseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- Munson v. City of South BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Serecky v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. RafuseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.