Peterman v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. P. deGraffenried, Judge. Action by E. 0. Chapman and Mary H. Dean against J. A. Peterman, Anna Peter-man, and Elmer Peterman, to recover damages for breach of warranty, instituted in the justice court, taken on change of venue to the City Court of Muskogee. From a judgment rendered in that court in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants appealed • to the district court.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. P. deGraffenried, Judge. Action by E. 0. Chapman and Mary H. Dean against J. A. Peterman, Anna Peter-man, and Elmer Peterman, to recover damages for breach of warranty, instituted in the justice court, taken on change of venue to the City Court of Muskogee. From a judgment rendered in that court in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants appealed • to the district court. On motion of the plaintiffs, the appeal was 'by the district court dismissed. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
This action was commenced October 14, 1916, in the justice court of Harry R. Milford, justice of the peace in Muskogee county, by E. C. Chapman and Mary H. ’Dean, as plaintiffs, against J. A. Peterman. Anna Peterman, and Elmer Peterman, as defendants, to recover the ■ amount of taxes paid by the plaintiffs because of a breach of warranty of defendants. By proper orders the case was transferred to the city court of Muskogee, and there judgment was rendered against the defendants in the sum of $100. with interest. The defendants appealed to the district court of Muskogee county. Tlie plaintiffs…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Howe v. Federal Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Culbertson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- R. B. Herndon Real Estate Co. v. DepewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921