Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 4, 2013No. 110270Published

1ConcurrenceKauger, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

1 The issue of the legislative amendment to 12 0.8.2011 § 19 in the aftermath of Zeier v. Zimmer, 2006 OK 98, 152 P.3d 861, was resolved in Timothy Wall v. John S. Marouk, D.O., 2013 OK 36, 302 P.3d 775, 2013 WL 2407160, which we promulgated today. After we held it to be unconstitutional, I had hoped that if only a small number of sections of the CLRA were infirm and unrelated, they could safely be severed. However, the bill is simply too large, and attempts to address too many subjects, to be reconciled with the requirements of the Okla. Const., art. 5, § 57.1

*795IL.

SECTION 74 OF…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Zeier v. Zimmer, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 314Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API