Legal Opinion

United States v. Jesse

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 2, 1987No. 85SA347PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

This is an appeal from partial summary judgment entered against the United States in a comprehensive adjudication of water rights in Water Division No. 2. The claims on which summary judgment was granted involve federal reserved water rights in the Pike and San Isabel National Forests, which are located in Water Division No. 2. The United States asserts that the withdrawal of the Pike and San Isabel National Forests from the public domain implicitly reserved appurtenant water necessary to maintain minimum instream flows over the forest lands. In United States v. City and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. Casebolt ex rel. Casebolt v. CowanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Cung La v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Peterson v. HalstedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Williams v. Midway Ranches Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API