Legal Opinion

Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1993No. CC 91-2044; CA A73139; SC S40166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Plaintiffs in this mandamus proceeding seek review of the Court of Appeals’ decision reversing the trial court’s peremptory writ of mandamus and remanding the case with instructions to dismiss. Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners, 117 Or App 385, 844 P2d 251 (1992), modified on reconsideration 119 Or App 6, 849 P2d 1125 (1993). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals on reconsideration, on different grounds.

In June 1990, plaintiffs applied to Columbia County (county) for a zone change and amendment to Comprehensive Plan Map 1. The amendment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Wright v. KECH-TVOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Edney v. Columbia County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Compass Corp. v. City of Lake OswegoOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Setniker v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Edney v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API