Legal Opinion

Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1992No. 91-2044; CA A73139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Plaintiffs applied to Columbia County for a comprehensive plan map amendment and zone change to redesignate their property from Primary Forest (PF-76) to Forest Agricultural (FA-19). After the county’s alleged failure to take final action on the application within 120 days after its completion, plaintiffs brought this mandamus action against the defendant county commissioners pursuant to ORS 215.428 to compel them to grant the application. The trial court granted a peremptory writ, compelling defendants to approve the application. Defendants appeal, and we reverse.

ORS 215.428 provides, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Campbell v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edney v. Columbia County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Edney v. Columbia County Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Edney v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Edney v. COLUMBIA COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSOregon Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API