Legal Opinion
Segreto v. Kirschner
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 30, 1997No. Civil Action 3:95 CV 0447(GLG)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendants Charles Rival (“Rival”) and Lawrence Callahan’s (“Callahan”) motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Richard Segreto (“Segreto”), claims that defendants violated his “civil and due process rights by intentionally, [sic] assaulting, battering, sexually harassing, defaming and discriminating against plaintiff without reason in violation of his civil rights.” 1 Plaintiffs Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Recommended Ruling, p. 1. For the reasons discussed below, we ratify and adopt the Magistrate Judge’s…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vega v. ArtusDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Sharp v. Ally Fin., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Washington-Pope v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Martin v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Nielson v. Legacy Health SystemsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.