The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gardina
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-1125-JSS-DCI CAROL GARDINA and GEORGE GARDINA, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER Defendants renew their motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) and move for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. (Dkt. 243.) Plaintiff opposes the motion. (Dkt. 251.) Upon consideration, the court denies the motion. BACKGROUND Defendants Carol Gardina and George Gardina are…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Busch v. County of VolusiaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
- Alice T. Cleveland v. Home Shopping NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.