Legal Opinion
Bradbury v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 12, 1978No. 2197-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.
The basic issue presented by this appeal is whether the decisions in Federated Am. Ins. Co. v. Raynes, 88 Wn.2d 439, 563 P.2d 815 (1977), and Cammel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 86 Wn.2d 264, 543 P.2d 634 (1975), interpreting the statute relating to uninsured motorist insurance coverage, RCW 48.22.030, should be applied retroactively. We respond in the affirmative.
On June 30, 1974, Gail Bradbury and Randy Henry were proceeding on Interstate Highway 90 near the Washington-Idaho border. A car driven by Nora Brubaker traveling in the opposite direction crossed the center line and struck…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Taskett v. King Broadcasting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Cammel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Hendren v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ashburn v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- Abshere v. Prudential InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.