Legal Opinion
Lindsay v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided April 19, 1985No. A-212PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
Peter P. Lindsay was found guilty, following a jury trial, of theft by receiving in the first degree in violation of AS 11.46.120 and AS 11.46.190. Lindsay appeals his conviction, arguing that certain evidence should have been suppressed, that proceedings against him should have been dismissed pursuant to Alaska Rule of Criminal Procedure 45 and that denial of his continuance motion constituted reversible error. We hold that evidence introduced at trial, including Lindsay’s taped confession and stolen goods recovered from Lindsay’s residence, were obtained by state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Haag v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
- People v. BrendlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Knowlton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
- Longley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
- Cannizzaro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.