Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Dilley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1984No. Docket 67219PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a grant of an accelerated judgment on her claims against defendants. Plaintiff claims that the trial judge improperly applied the statute of limitations for legal malpractice, MCL 600.5805(4); MSA 27A.5805(4), to her claims rather than statutes governing complaints alleging breach of contract or general negligence.

Plaintiff hired defendant Dilley and the law firm of which he was a member to act as her attorney in a lawsuit brought against her by Ethel and Dorothy Hartman. At a scheduled deposition, plaintiff and defendant Dilley had a serious disagreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wilkerson v. CarloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. LOCAL 1064, RWDSU AFL-CIO v. Ernst & YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wallace v. Detroit Coke Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
  3. Aldred v. O'Hara-BruceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Stroud v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Trowell v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Ctrs., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API