Barnard v. Dilley
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right from a grant of an accelerated judgment on her claims against defendants. Plaintiff claims that the trial judge improperly applied the statute of limitations for legal malpractice, MCL 600.5805(4); MSA 27A.5805(4), to her claims rather than statutes governing complaints alleging breach of contract or general negligence.
Plaintiff hired defendant Dilley and the law firm of which he was a member to act as her attorney in a lawsuit brought against her by Ethel and Dorothy Hartman. At a scheduled deposition, plaintiff and defendant Dilley had a serious disagreement…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Wilkerson v. CarloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Adkins v. Annapolis HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by27 opinions
- LOCAL 1064, RWDSU AFL-CIO v. Ernst & YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Wallace v. Detroit Coke Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Aldred v. O'Hara-BruceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Stroud v. WardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Trowell v. Providence Hosp. & Med. Ctrs., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.