Pickar v. Erickson

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Charles Pickar brought this action against respondents Peggy and William Erickson seeking an easement by adverse possession across the Ericksons’ property. The trial court determined that Pickar is not entitled to an easement. Pic-kar appeals from the judgment entered against him. We remand.

FACTS

This action is a dispute about Pickar’s right to use a road that crosses the Erick-sons’ property.

In 1934, three brothers — Clarence, Clifford and Bill Pickar — bought some property in Crow Wing County. Clarence, Charles’ father, purchased a forty-acre parcel on a…