Legal Opinion

Deno v. Standard Furniture Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1937No. 26266. En BancPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

These are actions for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs as the result of the breaking and giving way of the railing of an outside stairway appurtenant to a tenement house owned by the Standard Furniture Company. The plaintiffs joined, as parties defendant, the Standard Furniture Company, Berman Schoenfeld, L. Kenneth Schoenfeld et ux., Herbert A. Schoenfeld et ux., and Oser Dreck Company, a corporation. The cases were consolidated for trial.

At the close of the plaintiffs’ case, the court granted motions for dismissal as to all the defendants except Oser Dreck Company. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Platt v. Bradner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sipes v. Puget Sound Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Gosline v. DryfoosWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Coey v. DarknellWashington Supreme Court · 1901

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Garvin v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Seattle v. DunnWashington Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API