Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Callanan

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Kossuth District Gowrt. — Hon. George H. Care, Judge. Action in equity to quiet in the plaintiff the title to certain real estate. A demurrer to the petition haying been filed and overruled, the defendants refused to further plead, and a decree was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. —

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

The material facts stated in the petition are as follows: The plaintiff ^ claims title, to a tract of land situated in'Kossuth county, which contains forty acres, by virtue of a contract of purchase made with the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Cqmpany in April, 1886. That company claims title by virtue of a deed to it from the McGregor & Missouri River Railway Company, executed on the twentieth day of December, 1880; a patent to that company from the *109state of Iowa, dated April 8, 1871; a grant by act of congress to the state of Iowa for the benefit of that company, and a certification…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Buena Vista v. Iowa Falls & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. C. R. I. & P. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Hays v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Dorsey v. BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nicodemus v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Schlosser v. HemphillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API