Dorsey v. Banks
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. Scott M. Ladd, Judge. Action at law, aided by attachment, to recover the amount of a judgment rendered in Maryland. Richard S. Culbreth intervened, claiming an interest in the attached property. -There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment in - favor of the plaintiff for eighteen thousand, two hundred and thirty dollars and fifteen cents and costs, and in favor of the intervenor as to the attached property.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. Scott M. Ladd, Judge. Action at law, aided by attachment, to recover the amount of a judgment rendered in Maryland. Richard S. Culbreth intervened, claiming an interest in the attached property. -There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment in - favor of the plaintiff for eighteen thousand, two hundred and thirty dollars and fifteen cents and costs, and in favor of the intervenor as to the attached property. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.
The judgment upon which this action is brought was recovered by the plaintiff against the defendant, Andrew Banks, in the circuit court of Howard county, Maryland, on the fifth day of Septem*597her, 1889. This action was commenced on the seventh ■day of the same month, and on the same day the writ of attachment was issued, and levied upon the south half of section 11, in township 95, north of range 46, west, in Sioux county. On the ninth day of the month named, W. H. Siemen was garnished under the writ, and, on the thirteenth day of the same month, William Rieckhoff was also garnished. The…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Martin v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Bailey v. CallananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Jansen v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926