Legal Opinion
St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. Brutger
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 8, 1992No. C0-92-585PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Lindquist & Vennum appeals the trial court’s entry of judgment based on a levy against its trust account by respondent St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. We affirm.
FACTS
On January 11, 1991, Dan J. Brutger and the law firm of Lindquist & Vennum (L & V) entered into a written agreement under which L & V undertook representation of Brutger in connection with his financial difficulties. Brutger paid L & V an initial retainer of $109,255.70 which, according to the agreement, was
to be applied against any fees and costs currently owing, with the remainder to be deposited in [L…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Akers v. AkersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Jacobs v. HolstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- Schroeder, Siegfried, Ryan & Vidas v. Modern Electronic Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas A. Foster & Associates, Ltd. v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Brick Hearth Pizza, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Jackson Walker LLP v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014