Legal Opinion

Asheville Const. Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1927No. 2587PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law, instituted by the Southern Railway Company, hereinafter called the plaintiff, against the board of highway commissioners of Forney’s Creek road district, the Ashe-ville Construction Company, and H. A. Wells, to recover damages caused by blasting operations carried on in the construction of a public highway. By consent of the parties in writing, a jury trial was waived, and the ease referred in accordance with the North Carolina practice. The referee heard the evidence, and reported to the court his findings of fact and conclusions of law. The…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. Clemson Agricultural College of South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. St. Peter v. . DenisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Pope v. Edward M. Rude Carrier Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Guilford Realty & Insurance Co. v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API