Rosenfield v. Case
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Benzie. (Aldrich, J.) ■Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an action of replevin brought for a stock of goods owned by Jacob May at Frankfort, Mich.
The plaintiffs held a mortgage on this stoek, and there were also four other mortgages upon it. At the time of the trial these mortgages amounted to $6,129.84.
The defendant is the sheriff of Benzie county, and, at the time the writ of replevin was served, was in possession of the goods under attachment levies, and was taking an inventory of the same. Upon the trial the validity of the five mortgages was admitted by, the defendant, and the whole question in issue was whether the sheriff levied in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cary v. HewittMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Merrill v. DentonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Silberman v. MunroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Stack v. OlmstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Stamps v. ThomasAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.