Legal Opinion

Stack v. Olmsted

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Delta; Stone, J. Replevin by John K. Stack and John Corcoran, co-partners as Stack & Corcoran, against Frederick M. Olmsted, sheriff of Delta county, for property seized on execution. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant •brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The defendant is a sheriff, whose only claim to the possession of the property replevied from him is by virtue of a levy of an execution issued upon a judgment against the Masonville Hoop Company in favor of one of its creditors. The plaintiffs claim to own the property in question, except two old boilers, and to have a chattel mortgage upon them. Previous to the rendition of said judgment, the hoop company was indebted to the plaintiffs, and the findings of fact show that plaintiffs *360made an arrangement to aid the hoop company by furnishing money upon condition that they should own and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosenfield v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wasey v. WhitcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re OhakpoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API