Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Denton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Alpena. (Emerick, J.) Eeplevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

In the summer of 1886 John M. Blakely was carrying on the grocery business in the city of Alpena. On June 10 in that year he was indebted to plaintiffs, Merrill, Fiñeld & Go., of Bay City, Mich., in the sum of at least $2,579, and he executed on that day -& chattel mortgage to them for that amount. This mortgage was for the sum above mentioned, and embraced all the property in his business, except an iron safe, and contained a clause that the mortgage should cover also all goods and merchandise thereafter purchased for, or made .a part of, or entering into, the business and stock in trade of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles Root & Co. v. HarlMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cary v. HewittMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Rosenfield v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Breathwit v. Bank of FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  4. Tenney Co. v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sleeper v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API