Legal Opinion
People v. Rivera
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided August 18, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harvey Glasser, J.
Each of the three defendants moves to dismiss the informa*566tion for facial insufficiency. All three defendants are charged in one accusatory instrument with aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [3]), a class A misdemeanor. (Defendant Nicholas Santana is charged with an additional count of harassment [Penal Law § 240.25 (1)], a violation. However, that charge has not been challenged for facial sufficiency.)
Penal Law § 240.30 (3) provides as follows:
"A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DupontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. GrupeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
- People v. DinanLong Beach City Court · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. PirozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. LivioNassau County District Court · 2000
- In re John V.New York City Family Court · 2006
- Matter of John V.New York Family Court, Albany County · 2006