Legal Opinion
People v. Dinan
Long Beach City Court
Decided April 19, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jack Mackston, J.
Defendant is charged with a violation of subdivision 3 of section 240.30 of the Penal Law, aggravated harassment in the second degree, which provides:
“A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he * * *
“3. Strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same because of the race, color, religion or national origin of such person.”
The information alleges in substance that with intent to harass,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Van Berkel v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. JudizNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. ElkinMount Vernon City Court · 1948
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. DupontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. PrisinzanoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
- People v. GrupeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1988
- People v. LivioNassau County District Court · 2000
- People v. RiveraCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.