Legal Opinion

Jerome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 2011No. 3D11-1520Published

1Per curiam

David Jerome seeks review of the trial court’s order denying his Motion to Correct Sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Jerome’s motion is without merit, and the trial court properly denied it.

We observe that Jerome has raised the identical claims in several previous-filed postconviction motions, and the trial court’s denial of those claims has been affirmed on appeal.1 Jerome should be aware that the repeated filing of successive postconvietion motions, raising identical claims which have been denied on the merits and affirmed on appeal, is not without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Jerome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Jerome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Jerome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Jerome v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API