Legal Opinion

United States v. Consolidated Laundries Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 18, 1959No. 25533_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion to dismiss this appeal must be granted, as an order merely adjusting the record is not a final judgment from which a separate appeal lies and the error, if any, can be easily corrected in the appeals proper. United States v. Knight, 3 Cir., 162 F.2d 809; Dempsey v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New York, 7 Cir., 131 F.2d 103, certiorari denied 318 U.S. 769, 63 S.Ct. 761, 87 L.Ed. 1139; Belt v. Holton, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 148, 197 F.2d 579. The cross-motion is granted to the extent that in the main appeals from the judgments of conviction all documents submitted to the trial judge will be open…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Stephan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Friedman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  4. Dempsey v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. Belt v. HoltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stamicarbon, N v. V. American Cyanamid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Riley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cencal, S.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API