Legal Opinion

Cansino v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 2, 1994No. 92-AB-1160; CA A76169PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) denying her unemployment compensation benefits. EAB concluded that claimant was not entitled to benefits, because she voluntarily left work without good cause. ORS 657.176(2)(c). We affirm.

EAB adopted the following findings of fact:

“(1) Claimant worked for Meier & Frank as a ‘contingent’ worker hired primarily for the Christmas Season. (2) She began working on December 13, 1991 and her final day of employment was January 4, 1992. (3) She quit this employment because she did not wish to work out the remainder of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dennis v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gleason v. Oregon Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Bauerle v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API