Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Oregon Racing Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 2010No. 128934; A136562PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Oregon Racing Commission revoking his owner and trainer license. ORS 462.020. He raises a number of assignments of error, among them that the commission failed to hold a hearing within 90 days of his request for hearing made in response to the commission’s proposed notice of license revocation, as required by the commission’s administrative rule, OAR 462-130-0050(5). We affirm, writing only to address petitioner’s arguments concerning the timing of the hearing.

The commission is responsible for the regulation and licensing of all race meets held…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Valleur v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  2. Guzman v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Cansino v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Demeyer v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Demeyer v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API