Legal Opinion
Tobin v. Trans Union Systems Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1980No. Civ. A. 78-4368PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, William F. Tobin, is now fifty-nine years of age. In January of 1977, before the events leading to this litigation, he was employed as Eastern Regional Vice President by the defendant, Trans Union Systems Corporation (TUSC). Since that time, Tobin claims that he has been demoted, denied proper compensation and generally shut out of company affairs in an effort to force him to resign or to fabricate a pretext for his dismissal. Tobin brought this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, alleging…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Love v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Emra Joseph Bonham v. Dresser Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- KOCIAN, Charlotte T. v. GETTY REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY Appeal of Charlotte KOCIANCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Mull v. Arco Durethene Plastics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Sendall v. Boeing HelicoptersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- KOCIAN, Charlotte T. v. GETTY REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY Appeal of Charlotte KOCIANCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983