Legal Opinion
State v. Schad
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 3, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
KIMMELMAN, J.A.D.
Before the court are two separate appeals from distinct trials de novo in the Law Division, wherein defendant was twice convicted of violating provisions of the Township of Pennsauken (Township) sign ordinance. The violations charged in both cases were identical, but the cases related to different points in time. We ordered that the appeals be argued back-to-back. Since both matters involve the same facts and law, we now elect to treat the appeals together in this opinion.
Defendant operates adult entertainment businesses at two…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Service Armament Co. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Mimkon v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- State v. CameronSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State, Tp. of Pennsauken v. SchadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- John Keeley Timmie Orange Ariel Kilpatrick Charles Werdann, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Loomis Fargo & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Mountain Hill, L.L.C. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Keeley v. Loomis Fargo & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Mt. Hill, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Township of MiddletownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008