Sadler v. Sadler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The parties to this action are now living separate and apart. Each charges the other with abandonment. After the separation, defendant returned to the State of Georgia where she has since maintained her residence. Under these circumstances the plaintiff may not now assert the fictional unity of man and wife for the purpose of maintaining that his domicile is the domicile of his wife and children. Coble v. Coble, 229 N.C. 81, 47 S.E. 2d 798.
Plaintiff is a nonresident of the State of Georgia. Even so, he invoked the jurisdiction of a court of that State. He sought relief in that forum. He was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McRary v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Allman v. RegisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Coble v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Board of Commissioners v. ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richter v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Gafford v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Weddington v. WeddingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Romano v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Stevens v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963