Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. John James, Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Burlington Northern Railroad Company (“BN”) appeals from an order entered August 11, 1989, in the District of Minnesota, James M. Rosenbaum, District Judge, dismissing BN’s complaint on the ground that “its subject matter jurisdiction [was] limited to a determination of whether there is a rational basis and non-discriminatory purpose underlying the State of Minnesota’s valuation methodology.” Burlington Northern R.R. Co. v. James, (“James”), 725 F.Supp. 1058, 1063-64 (D.Minn.1989). Since the court’s holding that it had only “limited” jurisdiction amounts, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac R. Co. v. ForstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co. v. Encompass Services Corp. (In Re Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Trailer Train Co., Railgon Co., Railbox Co. v. State Tax Commission, Director of Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. BairDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.