Legal Opinion
Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co. v. Encompass Services Corp. (In Re Thickstun Bros. Equipment Co.)
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 2, 2006No. BAP 05-8054PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREGG, Bankruptcy Judge.
Thickstun Brothers Equipment Co., Inc. (the “Debtor”) appeals a bankruptcy court order denying its motion for .interpretation and clarification of its confirmed chapter 11 plan (the “Motion for Interpretation”) for lack of jurisdiction. For the following reasons, the court’s jurisdictional determination is AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
I.ISSUES ON APPEAL
The issues on appeal are whether the bankruptcy court erred in holding: (1) that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether the Debtor’s failure to object to a creditor’s claim…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Dow Corning CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Santander Consumer, USA, Inc. v. Houlik (In re Houlik)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Condon v. Brady (In Re Condon)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Meritage Homes Corp. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- McKinstry v. SergentDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2011
- Morris v. Zelch (In Re Regional Diagnostics, LLC.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.