Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hannah v. Armijo
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1933No. 3930PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKLEY, Justice.
The relators are members of the school board of the Santa Rosa municipal school district. An action was commenced in the district court for the removal of relators from office. The relators filed in said action an affidavit of disqualification of the district judge as provided for in chapter 184 of Session Laws 1933. The district judge ignored the affidavit, and was about to proceed with the case when application was made here for our writ of prohibition, and an alternative writ was issued. The sole question before us for decision is the constitutionality of the statute.
In…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Ex parte CornwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Van Slyke v. Trempealeau County Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Anaya v. ScarboroughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.